Jump to content

User talk:Jdege

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed years worth of accumulated stuff, from here, so that new material is easier to find. jdege (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Contact analysis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constitutional Carry

[edit]

Louisiana is now a Constitutional Carry state(signed into law March 5, 2024, effective date July 4, 2024), also May Issue for ALL former May Issue states was struck down with Bruen on June 23, 2022. Can you update the animated gif map showing both changes? 47.197.102.13 (talk) 06:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do jdege (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow South Carolina has Constitutional Carry now too![1] 47.197.102.13 (talk) 05:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Probably last for a while. jdege (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Theoretically, Bruen has made all May-issue states Shall-issue, but most of the states are still fighting multiple legal challenges. And I don't have good sources for which have given up and accepted the inevitable. jdege (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well wouldn't the Supreme Court's Bruen ruling have basically removed all May Issue states? The same as how McDonald removed all No Issue states? Also will you add the US territories: American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as Washington, D.C. to your map? 47.197.102.13 (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NY and HI responded to Bruen by making carry permits available, and then forbidding people to carry with a permit essentially everywhere. Lawsuits are ongoing. jdege (talk) 01:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just gave some updates on the changes in laws regarding "may issue" states going to "shall issue". The best thing would likely be to just eliminate all "may issue" states in 2022, 2023, & 2024 and mark them as "shall issue" since "may issue" is no longer constitutionally valid in any state since the Bruen decision in 2022, and Rhode Island has been a "shall issue" state since 1959 so that should be corrected to be more accurate regarding the map. I provided some good sources for you with actual law text pertaining to this issue. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Massachusetts Became "Shall Issue" in 2022

[edit]

https://www.bostonherald.com/2025/03/11/sjc-rules-massachusetts-nonresident-gun-laws-are-legal-after-post-bruen-changes/

This article has this to say about "May Issue" and "Shall Issue" in the commonwealth state.

"In such a case, according to the court, the issue with the law lies with its wording, specifically the “may issue” phrase prohibited after the Bruen decision, and because “it vested impermissible discretion in the licensing authority to grant or deny firearm licenses to nonresidents.” “We hold that the version of the Commonwealth’s nonresident firearm licensing scheme in effect at the time of the offense violates the Second Amendment. Accordingly, as the defendant was charged with violating (the law) after the Supreme Court issued Bruen, he is entitled to dismissal of that charge,” Associate Justice Frank Gaziano wrote for the court. In deciding Bruen, according to Gaziano, “The Supreme Court indicated that such discretionary ‘may issue’ firearm licensing regimes are presumptively invalid.” Marquis faced a similar charge that came well after the Bruen decision and after the Bay State updated its firearms laws to remove instances of “may issue” and replaced them with “shall issue” rules."

Should your map be updated to reflect this? OldDiddlyBop (talk) 18:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some more sources:

https://www.unionleader.com/news/politics/state/mass-high-court-hands-nh-gun-owners-a-big-setback/article_534607e4-feb2-11ef-9376-1b5db0fead5e.amp.html

https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/sjc-gives-second-amendment-win-mass-lawmakers-looking-license-non-residents%C2%A0

OldDiddlyBop (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE:

https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXX/Chapter140/Section131f

https://web.archive.org/web/20230601032225/https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXX/Chapter140/Section131F

https://web.archive.org/web/20240416020909/https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXX/Chapter140/Section131f

Here's the Massachusetts code, it says the Commonwealth of Massachusetts went from Shall Issue to May Issue on August 10, 2022 to comply with the Bruen Decision. Your animated .gif map and .gif stills from 2022, 2023, and 2024 should be updated to reflect this. If I find any other info with other states, I'll be happy to send you it to keep the map accurate. Great work btw. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

California Became "Shall Issue" in 2023

[edit]

https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/ccwl

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB2

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB2

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2023/09/26/governor-newsom-strengthens-californias-nation-leading-gun-safety-laws/

So yeah the California needs to be updated as "Shall Issue" as of 2023 in the animated .gif and the 2023 and 2024 still .gif images. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 21:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rhode Island has been a hybrid "Shall Issue" & "May Issue" state since 1959.

[edit]

https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE11/11-47/11-47-11.htm

"§ 11-47-11, as enacted by P.L. 1959(Public Law 1959)"

https://riag.ri.gov/press-releases/attorney-general-successfully-defends-ris-concealed-carry-permit-laws

"In July 2022, following the Bruen decision, Attorney General Neronha shared guidance with Rhode Islanders and local police departments advising that the state’s dual concealed carry permitting framework is constitutional and unimpacted by Bruen. Within this guidance, the Attorney General affirmed that municipal licensing authorities “shall issue” permits to qualified, suitable applicants who meet certain legal requirements, like a background check, without a showing of need. Given that Rhode Island law affords both mandatory and discretionary permitting, the Second Amendment is satisfied."

So local authorities are "Shall Issue" in Rhode Island since the year of 1959, but the Attorney General MAY ISSUE permits. So yeah it's a hybrid and should show up as "Shall Issue on your animated .gif map and in all .gif stills from 1986 - 2024 because 1959 is way before those years, lol. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii Became "Shall Issue" in 2023

[edit]

https://apnews.com/article/hawaii-gun-control-law-concealed-carry-permit-72e5ebe107fdea85319a4552dcb23b97

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/archives/measure_indiv_Archives.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1230&year=2023

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2023/bills/SB1230_.HTM

The law replaces all mention of "May Issue" to "Shall Issue". So the animated .gif and 2023 and 2024 still .gif images should be changed to reflect this. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]